Subscribe to Subscribe to 's comments

Archive for the ‘Events’ category

On Tuesday 27th July, Martyn Ahmet, who has recently visited the United States and met with members of our sister organisation there, will report on the conditions and struggles faced by American workers two years after the election of Obama.

Does the new health insurance scheme represent an increase in the social wage?

What does the outrage against BP’s pollution of the Gulf of Mexico represent?

How can workers make their voices heard in a political system dominated by big business?

This meeting will be held at The Cornubia pub, Temple Street, Bristol

EUROPE IN CRISIS

greece-2

The fight back against the neo-liberal cuts agenda begins now

The CWI school was attended by members  of our sister parties from all over Europe as well as visitors from other parts of the world. Amongst the participants were workers and youth from Greece, where there have been 6 general strikes since the beginning of 2010, Portugal, Spain and Ireland where workers are resisting unprecedented cuts in wages and services in the name of neo-liberal ‘fiscal stability’ in other words a massive cut in living standard to transfer wealth from workers to the bosses. This strategy is the same as the ‘Con-Dem’ government has in Britain and if not challenged could plunge Europe in a severe economic depression. Tom will relay eye-witness reports of these struggles and report on the discussion around perspectives and strategy for this Europe-wide battle.

The meeting will also prepare for the important meeting of the Bristol ‘Anti-Cuts Alliance’ on Thursday 22nd.

Everyone is Welcome.

7.30pm ‘The Cornubia’ Temple St, BS1

greece-1

helicopter

END THE SIEGE OF GAZA!

• End the Israeli blockade of Gaza. For the immediate withdrawal of the Israeli army from the Palestinian territories.

• For a mass struggle of the Palestinians, under their own democratic control, to fight for genuine national liberation.

• For international working class support for the Palestinians’ struggle.

• For independent workers’ organisations in Palestine and Israel.

• No trust in the world’s capitalist governments or the United Nations.

• For a struggle for democratic socialism in Palestine, Israel and throughout the Mid­dle East, with guaranteed democratic rights for all minorities.

CLICK HERE FOR ‘END THE SIEGE’ LEAFLET

On 16 June, the BBC “News at 10″, reported about the growing anger against the British government’s plans for cuts. Using Nottingham as an example, a meeting of the local Nottingham branch of the Socialist Party was shown.

Mad Axe Woman Margaret Thatcher
The new Tory-Lib Dem coalition government claims to be heralding in a ‘new politics’. But a large layer of workers throughout Britain have recoiled in horror at the prospect of a Tory-dominated government, because of the vivid memories of the devastation caused in the years when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister. Here Robin Clapp, south west Socialist Party secretary, assesses Thatcher’s legacy.

She stood in Downing Street after her first election victory in May 1979 and spoke the soothing words of St. Francis of Assisi: “Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. Where there is despair, may we bring hope.”

Nine years later, after a ferocious assault upon the living standards and democratic rights of the working class, the mask of healer had slipped revealing the real face of Margaret Thatcher. Once again she sought religious guidance, but this time the words came from St Paul: “If a man will not work he shall not eat.”

Thatcher’s reign was a nightmare for workers. Even before she became leader of the Tory Party in 1975 she earned the title ‘milk snatcher’ for withdrawing free school milk from school students when she was minister for education.

To those women who thought a female prime minister might be a step forward in the battle for equality, her anti-working class actions quickly shattered their illusions. Over half of Britain’s working women were denied the right to maternity benefits, paid maternity leave and shorter working hours. Publicly funded childcare fell to the lowest level in western Europe.

Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

Thatcher’s legacy was industrial devastation and increased poverty. Between 1979 and 1981 manufacturing output fell by a staggering 15%. The country was convulsed by rioting in 1980 and 1981, triggered by poverty, police repression and a widespread feeling that the government was hostile to ordinary people. Thatcher’s comment after the Liverpool Toxteth riot was confined to “oh those poor shopkeepers”.

Unemployment rose from 1.09 million in May 1979 to 2.13 million two years later and peaked at 3.13 million in 1986. Welfare rights and benefits were slashed, while the real scale of joblessness was hidden, with 28 changes in the way unemployment was calculated during the Thatcher years.

“Victorian values were the values when our country became great” she thundered in 1982 and in order to demonstrate her commitment to the social policies of the regressive 19th century, she presided over a bulging prison population, which by 1988 was the highest in the EU both relatively and absolutely.

The first Thatcher-led government was elected in May 1979. Britain had the lowest growth of productivity of any major industrial economy, falling profits, and an eight-fold increase of strikes compared to the 1930s.

With the Tory Heath government of 1970-1974 having been bloodied and eventually brought down by the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) and other trade union struggles, Thatcher’s coterie decided that they needed to launch a major offensive against the working class and its organisations.

The Labour government of 1974-1979 had faced both economic and political crises, being forced to call in the International Monetary Fund for financial help in 1976 and then embarking upon the first sustained cutbacks to public expenditure witnessed since 1945. Forcing a rigid incomes policy upon the unions had resulted in growing industrial unrest, culminating in a series of public sector stoppages in 1978-1979.

Thatcherism

The NHS under Thatcher

As early as 1977 the seeds of what became known as Thatcherism were sprouting. In a pamphlet called The Right Approach to the Economy, controlling money supply was emphasised, alongside lowering taxes, loosening pay differentials and removing ‘unnecessary’ restrictions on business expansion.

Monetarism, or supply-side economics, argues that inflation results when the government pumps money into the economy at a rate higher than the nation’s economic growth rate. Thus, government should keep a tight rein on the money supply and cut public expenditure. Supply-side economists maintain that this permits the economy as a whole to grow with business prosperity allowing a ‘trickle down’ effect throughout society.

Resorting very selectively to her bible, again she justified this stance in 1980 with her infamous comment that: “No one would have remembered the Good Samaritan if he’d only had good intentions. He had money as well”.

Thatcher’s government intended to abandon the post-war consensus of commitment to full employment, stating this was the responsibility of employers and employees. The government would no longer be a universal provider of services. This would be done by the market, the voluntary sector and self-help.

The Tories’ 1979 victory was a day of jubilation for the rich. On polling day the stock exchange enjoyed a record day as £1,000 million was added to the share index.

Alongside her Tory colleague Sir Keith Joseph who was a convert to the monetarist, pro-free market ideology of Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman, Thatcher identified her mission as weaning Conservatives away from the corporate state and Keynesian panaceas, which she believed had helped bring about Heath’s downfall.

Attacking the unions

Thatcher and her Hell's Angels gang

Hayek argued that liberty under a minimalist state was the ideal and that trade unions were the enemy of the free market. Thatcher echoed this prejudice in 1984 when she commented to the Financial Times: “I don’t believe that people who go on strike in this country have legitimate cause”. Neutering the unions became an obsession for the Tories. She was later to smear the heroic miners as ‘the enemy within’.

The crude application of monetarism was a disaster for the British economy. Manufacturing output fell sharply in 1980 and unemployment rose by more than any year since the 1930s. By 1981 output had fallen by 5.5% in two years. Crazily Thatcher forced through a budget that decreased taxes further while reducing public spending, precipitating an even deeper slowdown.

Most world leaders today have studied this period closely over the last two years and have learned that applying voodoo supply-side policies in a slump massively exacerbates its depth and longevity.

Entire areas of British manufacturing went to the wall in this period. The steelworkers fought a valiant battle to secure better wages and conditions but were betrayed by their leaders in 1980, only to see a massive closure programme unleashed upon their industry in preparation for privatisation.

Reiterating her mantra that ‘the way to recovery is through profits’ the British economy ground virtually to a halt, with imports of manufactured goods exceeding exports for the first time since the industrial revolution in Britain, the former ‘workshop of the world’.

Tory Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher as Wonder Woman?!

According to Thatcher, the combination of Britain’s North Sea oil receipts and the expertise of the service sector, led by the banks and the City, was the answer to the discredited theory of needing a manufacturing base.

The sale of council houses, combined with the privatisation of profitable sections of state industry gave a big boost to the stock exchange. The City was freed from its ‘fetters’ in the ‘Big Bang’ of 1986, allowing an orgy of financialisation and profiteering to follow.

Big battles broke out between the classes as Thatcher sought to rip up the post-war consensus. By the end of 1981 her government was the most unpopular ever and her personal approval rating slumped to just 23%.

It was an accidental factor of history that saved the Tories’ bacon. Always a crude jingoist, whose conference speeches to the Tory faithful conjured up the image of an imperial Britain, Thatcher, in an interview with the Times, had talked of her belief in “freedom of choice and the British Empire, which took freedom and the rule of law to countries which would never have known it otherwise.”

In 1982 the Argentinean military junta invaded the British-owned Falkland Islands/Malvinas. This was a desperate diversion in order to quell a growing radical social movement across Argentina which could overthrow the right-wing dictatorship.

The invasion gave Thatcher, already delighting in the title of Iron Lady given to her ironically by a Soviet army newspaper, an opportunity to clothe herself in the armour of Boudicea. A vicious two month war left 255 British and 650 Argentineans dead, but her approval rating leapt to 51% as she unashamedly played the patriotic card, infamously justifying the sinking of the Argentinean ship Belgrano with great loss of life even as it was retreating from the battle zone.

US support was crucial in assisting the Tories in defeating the junta in Buenos Aires. In her years as premier Thatcher was always at pains to talk up the Anglo-US relationship.

Right-wing US Republican President Reagan and Thatcher were drawn together by a shared belief in the moral superiority of societies founded on free enterprise and the imperative which followed from that - confronting internationally the menace of Soviet ‘communism’.

The Falklands victory was the platform for the Tories’ victory in 1983, even though their vote fell 2% compared to 1979.

It was time to tackle the unions. Already the Tories had bared their teeth in encouraging Eddie Shah, the anti-union owner of the Stockport Messenger, who sought to break the National Graphical Association (NGA). This dispute presaged a national print workers’ struggle when Rupert Murdoch set out to smash union membership and agreed practices by moving his presses to Wapping. Fines were levied against the unions and the police used brutal force to attack picket lines in scenes that would become commonplace in the great miners’ strike of 1984-1985.

The trade union leaderships retreated in the face of these attacks and the strike was defeated. Thatcher became emboldened, egged on by siren voices from the Neanderthal parliamentary back benches, with Ronald Bell MP shrieking that “strike-breaking must become the most honourable profession of all.”

Extreme Thatcherite Norman Tebbit became employment secretary and started to put the boot into the unions. Eleven separate anti-union measures were unveiled in a decade. First union officials had their immunity removed from legal action by an employer not party to a dispute and secondary picketing was made unlawful.

Later the immunity of the national union was withdrawn too. Secret ballots were introduced for union elections and the minimum period of work after in which an employee could claim unfair dismissal was extended from one to two years.

Next came the removal of statutory support for the closed shop and protection was introduced against dismissal of non-union members. Wages acts were passed which abolished minimum wages for under-21s and added restrictions were placed on the use of union funds.

The big showdown came in 1984 when the announcement of the pit closure programme led to strikes across the British coalfield. The Tories had learned from the 1972 and 1974 miners’ strikes and had drawn up contingency plans to defeat the strike. This involved the building up of maximum coal stocks at power stations and contingency plans to import coal. Non-union lorry drivers were to be used to help move coal and dual coal/oil firing in all power stations was to be rushed forward.

Thatcher had stepped back from confrontation with the NUM in 1981, but by 1984 felt ready. At a cost of £500,000 a day, 20,000 police were employed across the coalfields to break the strike, organised through a central police coordination authority.

Thatcher hoped for an industrial Falklands, a short, sharp victory. In fact the strike lasted for over a year, opening up a chasm between the classes. It also revealed once again the cowardice at the top of the trade union movement as leader after leader squandered opportunities to assist the miners with industrial action, or like the shameful right-wing leadership of the electricians’ union, openly aided the Tories.

Nevertheless, Thatcher’s government came perilously close to being defeated as dockers, rail workers and other battalions stepped into the breach to defend their comrades. At the end, the strike had cost the economy £2 billion, a figure that Thatcher’s chancellor argued was “even in narrow terms a worthwhile investment for the nation”.

Privatisations were now stepped up with gas, electricity, water and BT being sold. Despite the claim that this was creating a share-owning democracy, only 300,000 people ended up owning a portfolio of over ten shares.

Council homes were sold off too. Between 1979 and 1988 home ownership increased by three million with Thatcher explaining: “I want a capital-earning democracy. Every man a capitalist. Housing is the start.”

Opposition

Thatcher was defeated on the issue of the poll tax

Liverpool City Council became a big thorn in her side in this period, because it actually built 5,000 council houses, leisure centres, etc, but mainly because the councillors under the political leadership of the Socialist Party’s predecessor Militant, refused to carry through cuts. They stayed loyal to the socialist convictions upon which they had been elected. “These people have no respect for my office”, she spat in parliament, for once speaking the truth.

Despite claims by historians that it was policy divisions over Britain’s further integration into the EU that were responsible for her removal in 1990, it was the mighty anti-poll tax rebellion that reduced the Iron Lady to iron filings. 18 million men and women, marshalled in the Anti-Poll Tax Unions with Militant supporters playing the key role, refused to pay the tax and defied all the venom that she threw at us.

In taking on everyone at once she had made a decisive error. Tory back benchers went into panic as the shires revolted and the cities became no-go areas. The Sunday Times’ Robert Harris thundered in 1991 that the Poll Tax fiasco was “a fatheaded, boneheaded, dunderheaded, blunderheaded, muttonheaded, knuckleheaded, chuckleheaded, puddingheaded, jobbernowled wash-out of a cock up…”

Thatcher famously once said: “the lady’s not for turning” but we turned her out. She left in tears, stabbed like Caesar by her panic-stricken Tory friends. But in truth destroyed by the fury of non-paying working class people.

She had closed 286 NHS hospitals and allowed poverty levels to rise to over 9.5 million. Under her watch the richest 1% had grabbed over one fifth of the total marketable wealth of the country.

On one level she was just another provincial Tory, narrow-minded, racist and xenophobic, a barely disguised bigot who once praised a chief police officer for linking the AIDS virus with God’s retribution upon gays.

Every era, however, calls for personalities required by concrete circumstances. If they do not exist in a rounded-out form, it invents them. Thatcher was required by capitalism to put the hatchet into the post-war welfare state and in her the bosses found an eminently suitable candidate. However, she polarised society and the Tory party itself, damaging it for a decade.

Completely blind to the workings of their system the economic experts were almost euphoric throughout the 1990s. Now the revenge of recession has devastated Thatcher’s legacy. The Anglo-American model of free markets has failed, as have all capitalist economic models.

The myth that minimally managed markets are more dynamic than those subject to extensive government has been crushed. In Greece and elsewhere workers and young people are taking action to fight back against the implications of the failure of the market system.

As Thatcher nears the end of her life, the ideology she saw as her worst enemy - socialism - is being looked to with increasing interest by workers and young people moving into struggle to defend their living standards.

New Labour inheritance

Thatcher was to be eventually removed in a Tory coup in 1990, following the poll tax debacle, yet her policies of curbing the trade unions, privatising state resources and deregulating the City of London, intimidated and then entranced the emerging New Labour leadership around Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

In 2001 Labour’s Peter Mandelson tellingly said: “we are all Thatcherites now”, before enthusing that he was “intensely relaxed about people becoming filthy rich”.

Essentially New Labour represented a complete capitulation to the worst excesses of the capitalist market. Not for nothing did Thatcher praise Blair during his disastrous premiership, while Brown invited her to Downing Street for tea, praising her as a ‘conviction politician’ like himself. He even considered a £3 million state funeral for her, though millions would be happy to bury her for free - anytime.

On Sunday 13th June, Socialist Party member and TUSC general election candidate for Bristol South, Tom Baldwin was a guest on the BBC discussion programme ‘The Big Questions’, which was filmed from Ashton Park School in Bristol. 

The key theme of the discussion was ‘Does the Queen Deserve a Pay Rise?’. Tom Baldwin reports on his experience and offers his answer to this question:RECENTLY I was invited to speak as a Socialist Party representative on a BBC programme The Big Questions, a debate show being filmed in Bristol. One of the topics up for discussion was the monarchy and the civil list.

Tom Baldwin

The civil list is taxpayers’ money that goes to the Queen to cover the cost of her household and state events that she holds. This has been set at £7.9 million a year for the last 20 years but now the royal household is requesting an increase of £6 million. This is in addition to other public money they get for things like security.

So, at a time when working-class people face proposed public service cuts that would devastate jobs, services and communities the Queen, with enormous personal wealth, is asking for millions more of our money. The timing of this request shows how out of touch the royals are from their ’subjects’.

Some of the programme’s other speakers were similarly out of touch; one described the Queen as “famously frugal.” Most people of her age, surviving on a state pension that may be under £100 a week, would struggle to recognise this description of a woman with several palaces and many servants who lives a pampered life at our expense.

The debate quickly moved on from the monarchy’s cost to their future and what role they play in society. Other speakers argued that they provide a “democratic safety valve” and a check on elected politicians. I explained that accountability over elected representatives should be held by the people that elect them, not by an unelected monarch.

Right to recall

I said this should be provided by allowing voters the right to recall and replace representatives who they do not feel are standing up for them. These elected representatives should be put more in touch with the people they represent by receiving only an average worker’s wage.

Socialist Party members who stood in the general election as part of the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition all pledged to take only a worker’s wage if elected and we have a long and proud history of sticking to that position. The Queen, with her lifestyle, is a million miles removed from the vast majority of people in the country and cannot speak for us.

In reality the monarchy does provide a safety-valve, though it is not on behalf of ordinary people but of the ruling class. The monarch retains enormous constitutional power, for example, following an election it is up to them to offer someone the chance to be prime minister.

Other powers, such as an effective veto on any legislation passed and the right to dissolve parliament are held in reserve by the ruling class, to be used if they feel their interests are seriously threatened. As recently as 1975, the power of the monarchy was used to dismiss a government in Australia where the Queen is also head of state.

Socialists demand an increase in funding for vital public services and will be in the forefront of the fight to stop the cuts. But we won’t support the call for more money for ‘Her Majesty’.

As Greek-style austerity measures come to Britain we could also see Greek-style resistance. In this situation the capitalists will seek to use all the powers of the state, possibly including the monarchy, against the working-class to try and defend their system and make us pay for its failings. We must oppose this and demand the abolition of an unelected monarch and the House of Lords with all their powers.

The Socialist Party 2010 Manifesto

Vote Socialist 2010

Work & Income
- Trade union struggle to increase the minimum wage to £8 an hour without exemptions as an immediate step towards £10 an hour. For an annual increase in the minimum wage linked to average earnings.
- All workers, including part-times, temps, casual and migrant workers to have trade union rates of pay, employment protection and sickness and holiday rights from day one of employment. Enforce equal pay.

Unemployment
- No job cuts. Full employment through a massive programme of socially useful public works with a living wage of at least £8 an hour and a maximum 35-hour week.
- No cheap labour apprenticeships and unpaid internships. Guarantee at least the minimum wage and a job at the end.

Pensions & Benefits
- An immediate 50% increase in the state retirement pension, as a step towards a living pension. Reinstate the link with earnings now.
- Reject ‘welfare to work’. For the right to decent benefits without compulsion or means testing.

Public Services
- A socialist NHS to provide for everyone’s health needs, free at the point of use, in full public ownership and under democratic control.
- Free, publicly run, good quality education available at any age. Abolish tuition fees and introduce a living grant.

Housing
- No repossessions. Nationalised banks should offer cheap loans and mortgages for housing.
- Keep council housing publicly owned. For a massive building programme of publicly owned housing to provide good housing with low rents.

Infrastructure
- A democratically planned, low fare, publicly owned transport system. Renationalise the railways and the buses.
- End fuel poverty. Cut fuel bills immediately. Take the gas and electric companies into public ownership.

Democracy and Sleaze
- No MP to receive more than the average wage of a work, to be re-elected every two years, to be accountable and subject to recall and to have their expenses open to the scrutiny of their constituents.
- Abolish the House of Lords.
- Introduce a democratic form of proportional representation.

The Banks
- Nationalise all the banks on the basis of democratic public ownership. Compensation to shareholders only on the basis of proven need.
- End city fat cats’ bonuses, golden parachutes and gold-plated pensions.
- For a socialist government to exercise a monopoly of foreign trade, as a means of controlling all imports and exports including capital movement. No ‘flight of capital’.
- Reject the diktats of the ratings agencies, the European Central Bank and other unaccountable and unelected international finance bodies. For international workers’ solidarity and economic planning across borders.

The Economy
- Open the books at the major companies that dominate the economy; let popular committees of works, trade unionists and consumer groups see where the profits have gone.
- For a socialist government to take into public ownership the top 150 companies that dominate the British economy, to be run under democratic working class control and management. Compensation to shareholders only on the basis of proven need.
- A democratic socialist plan of production based on the interests of the overwhelming majority of people and in a way that safeguards the environment.

On Tuesday 21 July the Bristol YFJ campaign presented a petition of over 200 signatures to the council.

The hard work spent holding stalls, petitioning and raising awareness of the campaign really paid off as we managed to get local print, radio and TV coverage, hopefully spreading the message that there is a way to fight back to the thousands of those, like us, who are struggling to find employment.

Despite moves by the council to prevent us giving a statement with our petition because of an administrative error, it went off without a hitch.

I highlighted the rapidly increasing scale of youth unemployment and the failure of government to address the problem. The speech was met by a large round of applause led by the public gallery and joined by a sheepish council, who looked rightfully ashamed of their inaction in the face of the current crisis.

Overall the support shown by members of the public for the campaign is encouraging, as it demonstrates there is real backing for our generation’s struggle in the face of the biggest recession since the 1930s.

Jack Jeffrey, Bristol Youth Fight for Jobs & Bristol Socialist Party

On 8th August, members of the Bristol Central Socialist Party fanned out, visiting picket lines in Fishponds, Bristol Central, Kingswood and Yate to show solidarity to striking CWU workers at those depots. The response of the workers was open and friendly, with strikers taking solidarity leaflets.

The numbers taking part in picketing at Fishponds and Yate far exceeded the legal limits of six. At the Fishponds depot, pickets had a large dragon’s head and outfit, apparently designed to suprise managers as they drove delivery vans!

Striking workers in Yate got around directives from management saying that anyone blowing whistles at scabs would be disciplined, by installing a remote control fart machine by the gates.

Many of the workers were looking forward to a national strike in September.

Martyn Ahmet, Bristol Socialist Party

BRISTOL BIN workers, members of the Unite union, after taking five days of discontinuous strike action, and after planning an all-out strike over pay and conditions, have now accepted a last-minute offer.

Mark Baker, Bristol PCS member

The refuse collectors were due a pay rise in November and claimed a 5% increase in line with inflation at that time. Their employers, Sita, deliberately delayed negotiations and offered 2.75%, exploiting the recession to hit the workers’ terms and conditions.

Pam Jennings, Unite negotiator, explained that Suez group, of which Sita are a part, made £16.5 million profit in 2007 and get any costs plus 16% on top paid to them as part of their contract with the council. The madness of privatisation means council tax payers have to pay more to have their bins collected by a private company, who then don’t pay their workforce a living wage to collect them.

The company claims it can’t afford to pay the workforce what they should have. These workers have received no pay rise since 2007 and have many members such as road sweepers on, or just above, the minimum wage.

Sita UK’s website boasts: “We treat waste materials as a resource” - it’s a pity they haven’t treated their workforce as a valuable resource too.

The work was privatised in 1994 and although employees who transferred had their terms and conditions protected by TUPE legislation at the time, Sita have driven down pay and conditions for those starting since that time - for example new staff get no sick pay for the first three days of sickness. This is accompanied by an increasingly bullying management style towards the workforce.

A support group was set up including trade unionists and Socialist Party members. The anger and the organisation obviously worried the council, who have not so far even invoked penalties on the errant company. As one bin worker said: “Our pay rise is four or five months late every year. They’re not so slow to impose penalties on me if I don’t pay my council tax for a few months”.

Now the workers have accepted a 2.75% pay rise with the promise that future pay negotiations would be held at the Acas arbitration service, which workers will see as preferable to relying on Sita. But they will expect real improvements on issues such as pay and bullying management.